Fairly amazing that a car flipped at highway speeds and nobody was critically damage. Are any prices pending towards the horse owner? I don't wish to forged aspersions with out proof, so I will not name the business, nevertheless it appears pretty obvious a guess that the horses have been at a sure ranch and escaped. If that's the case, the homeowners possible board them there and the responsibility belongs with the ranch. Is probably not the proprietor's/owners' fault. Yes, nearly all of horses in the realm are boarded, not stabled on horse owner property. Pretty terrible time for these drivers, although. That is awful, & it could've been even worse. The property on each sides belongs to Stanford U. PVEC is a bunch of sub-barns and there may be at the very least one if not more extra operations farther up Ansel Lane. 280 the horses would have come from. Might you think about that someone intended their horses to be killed on the freeway? Too unhealthy it took the CHP an hour to forged the SIG alert - it seems they didn't react in time to stop continuing tragedy? Just for the report they did not come from PVTC! So solid all the aspersions you like! I didn't "blame" anyone, nor did I "imagine" someone wished harm, notice my use of the word "escape". I nonetheless doubt that would be the case. I was referring to @amazing that thought the homeowners would be liable. As for my guess, after trying at the map, I'm glad I didn't say the name, the one I used to be guessing is on the south side of 280, with the long lease. You'd want more than a handful of fingers to depend. My error stems from being a north peninsula gal, I still think of 280 as north/south! The information reported this morning that they got loose from Webb Ranch. I am more conversant in the south side stables; I do not know which is the obvious (ie.. Someone thought that they had latched a gate, but hadn't. The SJ Mercury News reviews that they wandered a mile from the corral the place a gate was left unfastened. Mea culpa -- I used to be reacting defensively in safety of the ranch I rode at as a kid (WR) which is on the "south" aspect of 280. From what I know, all their horses are also on the other facet of the creek from the 280 north on- ramp. There are going to be plenty of sad kids in addition to us adult horse lovers. I'm feeling very unhealthy for the ranch and all the children who rode these horses in classes. I am not feeling as bad for the ranch homeowners & youngsters who rode the horses as I am feeling for the horses themselves & the poor people who hit them. Glad no human lives had been lost and really sad for the lack of the horses. Sorry for my reactivity in earlier submit. Stunned anyone would blame the horse homeowners. Hazards like deer (and, previously, horses and cattle and even pedestrians and stalled cars) seem on 280. I try to not drive within the shoulder lane, particularly at night, to give myself extra room to maneuver should a deer sure into the roadway. Many folks use 280 as a speedway! What are they going to do if they hit a deer - sue the deer? I am a very long time Woodside and Portola Valley Resident. For the previous 15 years I have had cause to be on the 280 between the hours of 4:30-6:30am and that i can let you know not many maintain the pace restrict. Velocity and over driving the reach of headlights are seemingly culprits, so please do not blame the poor horses and their homeowners. It's as though drivers think that few drivers on the highway make it the Autobahn! They should treat it as though they are driving in icy conditions - Decelerate. The speed restrict is set because the safe speed below perfect circumstances, which includes daylight, anything lower than supreme calls for slower speeds. Perhaps if the CHP would spend more time within the early hours monitoring visitors we might have much less gridlock that begins with wildlife (or comparatively not too horse statue cheap $10 metal with price long ago domesticated animals) being hit and killed.
